<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introduction to Lambics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.beeriety.com/2010/02/04/introduction-to-lambics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.beeriety.com/2010/02/04/introduction-to-lambics/</link>
	<description>Discover a new beer variety!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: asakite1</title>
		<link>http://blog.beeriety.com/2010/02/04/introduction-to-lambics/comment-page-1/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>asakite1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beeriety.com/?p=1951#comment-281</guid>
		<description>I have tried Lindemans and Boon and, in my opinion, they are both great. The Lindemans Peche has to be my personal slice of heaven. Very enlightening article. keep it up guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried Lindemans and Boon and, in my opinion, they are both great. The Lindemans Peche has to be my personal slice of heaven. Very enlightening article. keep it up guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carleton</title>
		<link>http://blog.beeriety.com/2010/02/04/introduction-to-lambics/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Carleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beeriety.com/?p=1951#comment-271</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your contribution Andy. You&#039;re correct that Lindemans isn&#039;t completely traditional in its use of sweeteners, but we feel both approaches have their place and are worthy of attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your contribution Andy. You&#39;re correct that Lindemans isn&#39;t completely traditional in its use of sweeteners, but we feel both approaches have their place and are worthy of attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Dremeaux</title>
		<link>http://blog.beeriety.com/2010/02/04/introduction-to-lambics/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Dremeaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beeriety.com/?p=1951#comment-270</guid>
		<description>You are missing the mark on fruit lambic. Traditional fruit lambic is not sweet at all; the sugars of the fruit ferment out completely. Any sweetness that you find in a fruit lambic (such as those from Lindemans) is entirely artificial, and the beers are hardly lambic anymore. If you want some good fruit lambic examples, look for those from Cantillon, especially in the Lou Pepe series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are missing the mark on fruit lambic. Traditional fruit lambic is not sweet at all; the sugars of the fruit ferment out completely. Any sweetness that you find in a fruit lambic (such as those from Lindemans) is entirely artificial, and the beers are hardly lambic anymore. If you want some good fruit lambic examples, look for those from Cantillon, especially in the Lou Pepe series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

